Enough already

[dakii]

I think it is time to put a stop, you've had your laughs, currently unnamed players, I'm sick of the fact that I get called out for bailing out of gang wars because I am a "nab" and constantly being laughed at.

I remember when it came out, "Gang Wars". A fun minigame that will help rank the gangs by skill and not by how many the gang has currently online members.

I suggest, and what I would think will be agreed on by many, is to put some sort of lock on this mechanic. If there is one player attacking, there should be 1 player defending, right? Isn't that the point of ranking by skill? Fair Game? So on that note, the following should be a thing, like I stated, fair game, there isn't much more I would need to let you know. Other than, good luck on creating this mechanic, considering it get's added of course.

I am completely psyched out by this not being implemented on such long notice, or even suggested, on that matter.

But if I do get most downvotes, just think, it should be about fair game, right?

 

[bear]

If there is one player attacking, there should be 1 player defending

This is doable, but introduces a new problem.

If no defenders turn up, how are you ever supposed to successfully capture a turf? There's also times when there's no gang members online.

I do plenty of gang wars and honestly, I don't see a problem. If someone wants to call you a nab and laugh at you, why not just ignore them?

I'm sorry, but this is not something SFSE should need to protect against. We won't be implementing this suggestion.